Created Equal: A Common Thread of Humanity

I rarely talk “politics” with casual acquaintances, not for a lack of trying. People just don’t seem to care or feel comfortable engaging in conversation about such topics. That said, it seems that the topic of Bin Laden’s death is big enough to overcome that. I’ve had dozens of conversations in the past two days about it with people with whom I strongly agree, strongly disagree, or exchange little more than a “hello” every other week.

company-president-and-cleanerThe conversations have been heated but positive. It is clear that the destruction of this symbol of terror has lifted a weight off the shoulders of so many Americans, including myself. Bin Laden is dead, and that feels good. Period. At this time, I almost don’t want to think about costs, about anything, and just enjoy the moment, the realization that this icon of evil is gone.

cops-and-robbersI think a lot of Americans feel good in this way. It reminds me that there is a common uniting thread that runs through our nation. Each of our moral systems are more alike than they are different. Each of our lives, from the smallest blissful detail to the biggest tragedy, are more alike than they are different. A beautiful set of photographs by Mark Laira illustrates this idea brilliantly, two examples of which are shown in this post.

Tax Policy is not a Talking Point

I’ve had a lot of arguments with people about taxes in the past several days. What surprised me is how sure everyone is of their position. There are three broad options I hear:

  1. Increase taxes on just the very rich (with some dollar amount defining the threshold for the “very rich” label)
  2. Increase taxes on everyone
  3. Decrease taxes on everyone

And everyone provides basic arguments in support of each of these policies that boil down to the trade-off between freedom and equality.

What I think is missing is the question of absolute values. There are optimal tax policies for each basic political view. It’s impossible to know exactly what that policy is, but it’s probably not either of the extremes of (1) tax 100% of all income or (2) tax 0% of all income. So the question when someone wants to decrease taxes is not just “Why?” but “How much and why?”. It seems that few people have a good answer for “how much” except by referencing a historical value along with a questionable claim that this value led to some positive outcome.